Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
Since this work does cover multi-homing issues in the mip4 scenario,
I would like to support this work.
-Qin
----- Original Message -----
From: "McCann Peter-A001034" <pete.mccann at motorola.com>
To: <mip4 at ietf.org>
Cc: "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik at levkowetz.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:47 PM
Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
> Hi, all,
>
> During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on
> the multiple tunnel support and flow movement, as described in
> these two drafts:
>
> draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
> draft-tsirtsis-mip4-flowmove-01.txt
>
> The sense of the room seemed to be that we should combine these
> two drafts and take the result on as a new work item.
>
> This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach. Please
> respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree
> or disagree, and state your reasons why.
>
> -Pete
>
> --
> Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
> Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
> Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
> Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/
>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.