Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support

["Kent Leung (kleung)" <kleung at cisco.com>]

I support this work item because multiple tunnel support is a real-world
use case.

Kent 

-----Original Message-----
From: mip4-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mip4-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
McCann Peter-A001034
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:48 AM
To: mip4 at ietf.org
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz
Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support

Hi, all,

During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on the
multiple tunnel support and flow movement, as described in these two
drafts:

draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
draft-tsirtsis-mip4-flowmove-01.txt

The sense of the room seemed to be that we should combine these two
drafts and take the result on as a new work item.

This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach.  Please
respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree or
disagree, and state your reasons why.

-Pete
 
--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/