Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4)



Hi MIP4ers,

About the new Charter...

IESG Secretary a écrit :
The Mobility for IPv4 (mip4) working group in the Internet Area of the
IETF has been rechartered.  For additional information, please contact the
Area Directors or the working group Chairs.

Mobility for IPv4 (mip4)
-------------------------
Last Modified: 2009-08-18

Additional information is available at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mip4

[...]

Description of Working Group:

IP mobility support for IPv4 nodes (hosts and routers) is specified in
RFC3344. RFC 3344 mobility allows a node to continue using its
"permanent" home address as it moves around the Internet. The Mobile
IP protocols support transparency above the IP layer, including
maintenance of active TCP connections and UDP port bindings. Besides
the basic Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4) protocols, several other drafts deal
with concerns such as optimization, security, extensions, AAA support,
and deployment issues.

[...]

Goals and Milestones:

[...]

Done Base MIPv4 Mobile Network Support (Draft Std.) to IESG

It's a Proposed Standard for the moment, no?

In the previous IESG request to the WG to review the Recharter proposal (July 21st 2009) this figured as a Proposed Standard. And now it figures as a Draft Standard... what happened in between? Are there reports of wider deployment? More interoperable implementations?

I am only aware of the Cisco and Motorola implementations.

[...]

Aug 2009 NEMO Dynamic Address Assignment (Proposed Std.) to IESG

Is there a draft for this?  I would like to comment on it, thanks,

Alex



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.