Charles,
Do you think it could make sense to cite rfc5177 "Network Mobility
(NEMO) Extensions for Mobile IPv4" in this 3344bis Mobile IPv4 draft?
I am asking because (contrary to the Mobile IPv6 situation) the
rfc3344bis draft makes explicit textual statements about "Mobile
Router", which is a central entity of rfc5177.
Alex
Internet-Drafts at ietf.org a écrit :
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This draft is a work item of the Mobility for IPv4
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IP Mobility Support for IPv4, revised Author(s) :
C. Perkins
Filename : draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-08.txt Pages : 108
Date :
2009-10-7 This document specifies protocol enhancements that allow
transparent routing of IP datagrams to mobile nodes in the Internet.
Each mobile node is always identified by its home address, regardless
of its current point of attachment to the Internet. While situated
away from its home, a mobile node is also associated with a care-of
address, which provides information about its current point of
attachment to the Internet. The protocol provides for registering
the care-of address with a home agent. The home agent sends
datagrams destined for the mobile node through a tunnel to the
care-of address. After arriving at the end of the tunnel, each
datagram is then delivered to the mobile node.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-08.txt
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing
list I-D-Announce at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft
directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
