[Mip6] Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mip6] Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
- To: <mip6 at ietf.org>
- Subject: [Mip6] Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
- From: "Gopal Dommety \(gdommety\)" <gdommety at cisco.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:44:00 -0800
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=gdommety@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1002 verified; );
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3884; t=1163270642; x=1164134642; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=gdommety@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Gopal=20Dommety=20\(gdommety\)=22=20<gdommety@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Should=20we=20add=20the=20requirements=20that=20arise=20from= 20=20RFC=204285=20in=20the=20draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03? |Sender:=20; bh=BEWq03I8k7GpgkqQp7lKtwwADmWGjDCmVdxmZ3hRSfw=; b=dWqNpjBHE8m6xK752R4hdftFW/8xJBtk55ozQr77IiWvQAs4gcDLiKwqaXC0/0laDnu+mcEv YZPjNZJZo0o0LLfWEKjgC6y86+ClFfnNiP1wm0JaK44awJYG1hkQChn0;
- List-help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: mip6.ietf.org
- List-post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Thread-index: AccC4YzvjU4CBanBTfaaDZOjY6wJTw==
- Thread-topic: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
Hello
All,
Wanted to get the MIP6 Working
groups preference on whether we should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the
draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03
We would like to
hear the Working Groups opinion of the following question:
Should we add the
requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the
draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
Please answer "yes"
or "no" PS: In the IETF Mip6 WG meeting there were 14 people for "yes" and 5 for
"No".
Cheers,
Gopal and
Raj
_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
