Re: [MEXT] [Recharter.2]

[marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo at bagnulo.net>]

FWIW this expression of opinions is only part of the input that we  
will be considering for this decision, as Julien has already  
mentioned, since we also have other inputs to be added to this, like  
previous discussion and expressions of interest, in order to fully  
evaluate where the WG stands and in what items they would be willing  
to investe their energy

Regards, marcelo

El 12/02/2008, a las 19:33, Vijay Devarapalli escribió:

> Hi Julien,
>
> Here is my list.
>
> [R] Generic Notification Message for Mobile IPv6
> [R] 4283bis to extend MN identifier to other identifiers
> [C] Binding Revocation for IP Mobility
> [E] MIPv6 home link operation in various SDOs
> [C] Virtual Home Link configuration for Mobile IPv6
> [C] Interaction between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE by PF_KEY extensions
> [R] GRE requirements for IPv6 mobility
>
> Vijay
>
> ps: This is turning out to be a beauty contest. :)
>
> Julien Laganier wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> This is the next step in the recharter process. We'd like to get  
>> input
>> from WG participants on what should be the items included in
>> rechartering, what are their priorities, and who is willing to
>> sustain the effort. When that step is completed we will take the WG
>> input and discuss with our AD to move forward with deciding what to
>> include or not in the charter. Your input should be sent to the list
>> during the following two weeks, by 2008-02-26.
>>
>> Please pick from the list of items below the items you think the WG
>> should work on, and order them in decreasing priority (just to make
>> sure, first priority items goes first in the list you're making :).
>>
>> List of items:
>>
>> Binding Revocation for IP Mobility
>> MIPv6 home link operation in various SDOs
>> IP Tunneling Optimization in a Mobile Environment
>> Generic Notification Message for Mobile IPv6
>> GRE requirements for IPv6 mobility
>> 4283bis to extend MN identifier to other identifiers
>> Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping for the Authentication Option Protocol
>> Interaction between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE by PF_KEY extensions
>> Virtual Home Link configuration for Mobile IPv6
>> Extend DSMIPv6 Home Network Support
>>
>> Also, please prefix each of the items in your list with the letters  
>> E, C
>> and/or R if you're willing to:
>>
>> - [E]dit: Are you willing to edit the draft corresponding to the
>>  item.
>>
>> - [C]ontribute: Are you willing to propose text for the draft.
>>
>> - [R]eview: Are you willing to review new revisions of the draft when
>>  being asked by the chairs.
>>
>> As an example, that could be one input list:
>>
>> E MIPv6 home link operation in various SDOs
>> CR Binding Revocation for IP Mobility
>> R IP Tunneling Optimization in a Mobile Environment
>>
>> meaning that the MIPv6 home link is first priority and you  
>> volunteer to
>> edit, Binding revocation is second priority and you're willing to
>> contribute and review, while IP tunneling optimization is third
>> priority and you're willing to review.
>>
>> Hope this is understandable :)
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- julien and marcello, MEXT chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT at ietf.org
>> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext