Re: [MEXT] TLV header in DSMIP

[Basavaraj Patil <basavaraj.patil at nsn.com>]

Hi Hesham,

Your proposal below is fine and we can move forward.

-Raj 


On 4/3/08 3:44 AM, "ext Hesham Soliman" <hesham at elevatemobile.com> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> During one of the reviews for DSMIP the issue came up regarding the
> TLV header Type field values and how the current spec doesn't describe
> how it can be used for IPsec.
> After looking into this a bit I don't see why we would need IPsec for
> this. We originally defined because people wanted to use GRE so the
> format would be:
> IP
> UDP
> GRE
> IP
> ...etc
> 
> It seems like it would be sufficient to only define this now for GRE
> and if someone comes up with a need for using IP/IPsec directly after
> the TLV header they can define that behaviour and request a new type
> value.
> 
> So the new draft would only allocate one value for GRE.
> 
> Any objections to this ? please respond quickly, we need to finish
> this ASAP.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hesham
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext