Re: [MEXT] TLV header in DSMIP

[<Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com>]

Well... I can't say that I like it, but it probably works. And 
none of the other solutions (like adding a new DSMIPv6 specific
payload to IKE, or running a separate copy of IKE/IPsec for DSMIPv6)
were very good either.

Best regards,
Pasi 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext George Tsirtsis [mailto:tsirtsis at googlemail.com] 
> Sent: 04 April, 2008 16:05
> To: Eronen Pasi (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)
> Cc: dvijay at gmail.com; hesham at elevatemobile.com; mext at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] TLV header in DSMIP
> 
> Pasi, you describe this as the way it is ...but do you have a problem
> with that and why?
> 
> Thanks
> George
> 
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:42 AM,  <Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com> wrote:
> > Vijay Devarapallli wrote:
> >
> >  > Without this, you end up using UDP port 4500 for IPsec protected
> >  > data traffic between the mobile node and the home agent and the
> >  > DS-MIPv6 UDP port for non-IPsec protected data traffic 
> >  > between the
> >  > mobile node and the home agent. I would prefer to avoid this.
> >
> >  In the current spec (version -01) this is precisely the situation:
> >  traffic protected with IPsec tunnel mode uses port 4500.
> >
> >  (BU/BAck is protected with transport mode IPsec, but in that case,
> >  the packet also has an IPv6 header, so the TLV-Header type would
> >  be IPv6.)
> >
> >  Best regards,
> >  Pasi
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext