Re: [MEXT] TLV header in DSMIP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MEXT] TLV header in DSMIP
> BTW, I've stated several times that I believe that an average
> implementor (i.e., someone who hasn't participated in writing this
> specification and doesn't have a PhD) can't actually figure out how
> the DSMIPv6/IPsec interaction works based on the current spec
> (which is already in much better shape than earlier versions).
=> Actually that comment was on an older version but feel free to make
it now again :)
>
>
> I do understand that Hesham as the editor cannot (and should not)
> fix this alone -- so I would really appreciate if other WG members
> would help with writing the needed text.
>
> I've suggested e.g. showing packets (both before and after IPsec
> processing) with their headers to show what traffic is sent from/to
> which port (and how IPsec interacts with this). In particular,
> "using 4500 for secure traffic and DSMIP port for other traffic"
> is *not* what the current spec says.
=> George and Wassim have volunteered to do this, thanks guys.
Hesham
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.