Re: [MEXT] TLV header in DSMIP

["George Tsirtsis" <tsirtsis at googlemail.com>]

Well, I have volunteered and indicated that Wassim will probably help,
but have not asked him yet :-)
Note that I am not convinced that diagrams are really appropriate for
the packet descriptions...I will have to look at that. In any case the
idea is to provide clear description of packet headers before and
after IPSEC processing in various cases.

Regards
George

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Hesham Soliman
<hesham at elevatemobile.com> wrote:
>
>  > BTW, I've stated several times that I believe that an average
>  > implementor (i.e., someone who hasn't participated in writing this
>  > specification and doesn't have a PhD) can't actually figure out how
>  > the DSMIPv6/IPsec interaction works based on the current spec
>  > (which is already in much better shape than earlier versions).
>
>  => Actually that comment was on an older version but feel free to make
>  it now again :)
>
>
>  >
>  >
>  > I do understand that Hesham as the editor cannot (and should not)
>  > fix this alone -- so I would really appreciate if other WG members
>  > would help with writing the needed text.
>  >
>  > I've suggested e.g. showing packets (both before and after IPsec
>  > processing) with their headers to show what traffic is sent from/to
>  > which port (and how IPsec interacts with this). In particular,
>  > "using 4500 for secure traffic and DSMIP port for other traffic"
>  > is *not* what the current spec says.
>
>  => George and Wassim have volunteered to do this, thanks guys.
>
>  Hesham
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  MEXT mailing list
>  MEXT at ietf.org
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext