[MEXT] Changes in the CNs (was Re: A Proposed Solution for AeronauticalRO

[marcelo bagnulo <marcelo at it.uc3m.es>]

> I'm not against "big" changes in controlled environments as the
> aerospace one, but I just  want to know whether those changes could be
> made or not.
>
>   
 From what i understand, the question on whether updating CNs in the ATS 
domain to support nemo RO was explicitly asked several times and the 
question in all cases was:
- it may be possible sometimes, but any accetable solution MUST be able 
to work with unchanged (legacy IPv6) CNs and offloading the nemo RO 
processing to a proxy box topologically near.

Wes, is my understanding correct? has this been expressed in the 
requirements document? would it be in the next version? I think that it 
is important to nail these requirements down, including all the relevant 
informaiton there (in particular with respect to this issue which seems 
very imporntat), cause, if not people working in solutions are not able 
to design properly

Regards, marcelo


_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext