[MEXT] [rfc3775] Application using the care-of address
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MEXT] [rfc3775] Application using the care-of address



Folks,

I'd like to propose an additional change to RFC3775. The change is 
minor, and informative only:

Reason for change: RFC3775 mentions two times the possibility to use the 
care-of address as a source address in outgoing packets. In the first 
occurence, RFC3775 says that APIs to control this use are out-of-scope, 
but since an API that allows an application to require the care-of 
address to be used in outgoing packets has been specified since then in 
RFC5014, RFC3775bis could mention RFC5014 as an example of such an API. 
In the second occurence, RFC3775 says that a multicast application 
could use the care-of address as a source address in outgoing packets 
if it know the care-of address, but since RFC5014 allows to use the 
care-of address as a source address without requiring the application 
to knows the address itself that should be corrected in RFC3775bis. See 
below the two slights modifications, plus the additional informative 
reference.

Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,

--julien

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

OLD:

   o  The mobile node MAY choose to directly use one of its care-of
      addresses as the source of the packet, not requiring the use of a
      Home Address option in the packet.  This is particularly useful
      for short-term communication that may easily be retried if it
      fails.  Using the mobile node's care-of address as the source for
      such queries will generally have a lower overhead than using the
      mobile node's home address, since no extra options need be used in
      either the query or its reply.  Such packets can be routed
      normally, directly between their source and destination without
      relying on Mobile IPv6.  If application running on the mobile node
      has no particular knowledge that the communication being sent fits
      within this general type of communication, however, the mobile
      node should not use its care-of address as the source of the
      packet in this way.

      The choice of the most efficient communications method is
      application specific, and outside the scope of this specification.
      The APIs necessary for controlling the choice are also out of
      scope.

NEW:

   o  The mobile node MAY choose to directly use one of its care-of
      addresses as the source of the packet, not requiring the use of a
      Home Address option in the packet.  This is particularly useful
      for short-term communication that may easily be retried if it
      fails.  Using the mobile node's care-of address as the source for
      such queries will generally have a lower overhead than using the
      mobile node's home address, since no extra options need be used in
      either the query or its reply.  Such packets can be routed
      normally, directly between their source and destination without
      relying on Mobile IPv6.  If application running on the mobile node
      has no particular knowledge that the communication being sent fits
      within this general type of communication, however, the mobile
      node should not use its care-of address as the source of the
      packet in this way.

      The choice of the most efficient communications method is
      application specific, and outside the scope of this specification.
      The APIs necessary for controlling the choice are also out of
|     scope. One example of such an API is described in the IPv6 Socket 
|     API for Source Address Selection specification [RFC5014].

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

OLD:

   A mobile node that wishes to send packets to a multicast group also
   has two options:

   1.  Send directly on the foreign link being visited.

       The application is aware of the care-of address and uses it as a
       source address for multicast traffic, just like it would use a
       stationary address.  The mobile node MUST NOT use Home Address
       destination option in such traffic.

NEW:

   A mobile node that wishes to send packets to a multicast group also
   has two options:

   1.  Send directly on the foreign link being visited.

|      The application uses the care-of address as a source address for
|      multicast traffic, just like it would use a stationary address. 
|      This requires that the application either knows the care-of 
|      address, or uses an API such as the IPv6 Socket API for Source
|      Address Selection specification [RFC5014] to request the stack to
|     use the care-of address as a source address in sent packets. The
       mobile node MUST NOT use Home Address destination option in such
       traffic.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEW:

18.2.  Informative References

|  [RFC5014] Nordmark, E., Chakrabarti, S., and Laganier, J., "IPv6
|            Socket API for Source Address Selection", RFC 5014, 
|            September 2007.
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.