Re: [MEXT] Adoption of FW docs as MEXT WG drafts

[Frank Xia <xiayangsong at huawei.com>]

Yes, the two drafts should be made WG drafts.

BR
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Julien Laganier" <julien.IETF at laposte.net>
To: <mext at ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:43 AM
Subject: [MEXT] Adoption of FW docs as MEXT WG drafts


> Folks,
>
> We are chartered to produce informational documents describing Mobile
> IPv6 Operation with Firewalls but so far we have no corresponding WG
> drafts.
>
> There are two individual submissions filling this hole together:
>
> - Guidelines for firewall vendors regarding MIPv6 traffic
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-krishnan-mip6-firewall-admin-04.txt>
>
> -Guidelines for firewall administrators regarding MIPv6 traffic
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-krishnan-mip6-firewall-admin-04.txt>
>
> They have been updated as per comments received during last IETF meeting
> and we agreed we would ask for their adoption as WG drafts. Hereby we'd
> like to request the WG participants to answer the following question:
>
> Shall the two drafts above be made WG drafts?
>
> Thank you for your support.
>
> --julien & marcelo, MEXT chairs.
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> 


_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext