Re: [MEXT] Adoption of FW docs as MEXT WG drafts

["Jean-Michel Combes" <jeanmichel.combes at gmail.com>]

Hi,

it's OK for me these two drafts become WG drafts.

Best regards.

JMC.


2008/6/17, Julien Laganier <julien.IETF at laposte.net>:
> Folks,
>
>  We are chartered to produce informational documents describing Mobile
>  IPv6 Operation with Firewalls but so far we have no corresponding WG
>  drafts.
>
>  There are two individual submissions filling this hole together:
>
>  - Guidelines for firewall vendors regarding MIPv6 traffic
>  <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-krishnan-mip6-firewall-admin-04.txt>
>
>  -Guidelines for firewall administrators regarding MIPv6 traffic
>  <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-krishnan-mip6-firewall-admin-04.txt>
>
>  They have been updated as per comments received during last IETF meeting
>  and we agreed we would ask for their adoption as WG drafts. Hereby we'd
>  like to request the WG participants to answer the following question:
>
>  Shall the two drafts above be made WG drafts?
>
>  Thank you for your support.
>
>  --julien & marcelo, MEXT chairs.
>  _______________________________________________
>  MEXT mailing list
>  MEXT at ietf.org
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext