Re: [MEXT] DSMIPv6 deregistration

[Hesham Soliman <hesham at elevatemobile.com>]

On 26/06/08 1:48 PM, "Sri Gundavelli" <sgundave at cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vijay Devarapalli wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> What will be the key for the binding lookup ? If the
>>> entries are kept seperate, is the v4 HoA not required ?
>> 
>> If you have two separate bindings, you need to link them in your
>> implementation. If the primary binding cache entry (I consider the one
>> for the IPv6 home address as the primary one) is removed, the IPv4 home
>> address binding cache entry should also be removed.
>> 
> 
> If the draft has recommendation for seperate binding entries,

=> The draft has no such recommendation. There is only one logical binding
and that is tied to the IPv6 address.

>> Currently we don't support a scenario where the mobile node can delete
>> the binding cache entry for the IPv6 home address, but keep the one for
>> the IPv4 home address.
>> 
> 
> I thought selective dereg is possible.

=> No.

Hesham


_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext