![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi, "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins at earthlink.net> writes: > It seems to me that socket handling by IKE versus > availability of the Care-of Address from MIPv6 is > out of scope for rfc3775bis. I've created a new issue > for Julien's original proposed (informational) update. > Up until now, I haven't included the text for the IKE > socket handling question as part of the background > discussion for the new issue, but I can always go back > and add it later if need be. Sorry for replying to your other email, that one would probably have been more appropriate. Thanks for your work, Cheers, a+
Attachment:
pgp4IjLddVvU2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list MEXT at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext