Re: [MEXT] [rfc3775] Application using the care-of address

["Hui Deng" <denghui02 at gmail.com>]

Hi,

 

I am fine with it,

 

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-qi-mip6-ikev2-interfacing-01.txt

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sugimoto-mip6-pfkey-migrate-04.txt

I guess that most of the authors here go to both IPsec and

MIP6 ML as well.

 

Thanks

 

-Hui

2008/7/9 Arnaud Ebalard <arno at natisbad.org>:

Hi,

"Hui Deng" <denghui02 at gmail.com> writes:

> I agree that socket handling by IKE versus availability of the CoA
> from MIPv6 is out of scope for RFC3775bis.

me too.

> We'd better start a new seperated work item asap.

I'll start a thread on that point next week if you are ok.

This will incude gathering some feedback from people that implemented
IKE+MIPv6.

IMHO, the discussion belongs (should start) on both IPsec ML and mext
ML.

a+

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext