Re: [MEXT] [netlmm] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was RE:FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MEXT] [netlmm] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was RE:FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)
there was a typo in my previous mail:
[..] that the alt-CoA must be saved in the BCE
should have been
[..] that the source IP of the BU must be saved in the BCE.
domagoj
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Premec, Domagoj
> Sent: 21. listopad 2008 00:44
> To: Brian Haley
> Cc: Netlmm; mext at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] [netlmm] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was
> RE:FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)
>
> Brian,
>
> > If some new draft needs the
> > original source address saved, then it should specify it.
> > Maybe that's what you meant and I mis-understood?
>
> Yes, that was my point. The original question in this thread
> was "where is the Binding revocation sent to if the PBU
> contained alt-CoA", and one option would be to specify in the
> Binding revocation draft that the alt-CoA must be saved in the BCE.
>
> domagoj
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Haley [mailto:brian.haley at hp.com]
> > Sent: 20. listopad 2008 19:53
> > To: Premec, Domagoj
> > Cc: Alper Yegin; Netlmm; mext at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [netlmm] [MEXT] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was RE:
> > FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)
> >
> > Premec, Domagoj wrote:
> > > I agree with others here that the source IP of the BU is
> > available during the BU/Back transaction processing and once the
> > transaction is completed, the source IP of the BU is gone.
> IMO if we
> > want the source IP of the BU to be saved in the BCE, this must be
> > specified in some RFC.
> >
> > I agree that we don't need the source address once we send
> the BAck,
> > just the CoA, which is usually the source address.
> > But I don't think we need to specify if the address is saved in the
> > conceptual data structure mentioned in 3775,
> implementations are free
> > to store additional information in a BCE if they wish, and
> most do.
> > If some new draft needs the original source address saved, then it
> > should specify it.
> > Maybe that's what you meant and I mis-understood?
> >
> > -Brian
> >
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.