Re: [MEXT] [netlmm] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was RE:FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MEXT] [netlmm] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was RE:FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)



there was a typo in my previous mail: 

[..] that the alt-CoA must be saved in the BCE

should have been

[..] that the source IP of the BU must be saved in the BCE.

domagoj


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Premec, Domagoj
> Sent: 21. listopad 2008 00:44
> To: Brian Haley
> Cc: Netlmm; mext at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] [netlmm] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was 
> RE:FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)
> 
> Brian,
> 
> > If some new draft needs the
> > original source address saved, then it should specify it.  
> > Maybe that's what you meant and I mis-understood?
> 
> Yes, that was my point. The original question in this thread 
> was "where is the Binding revocation sent to if the PBU 
> contained alt-CoA", and one option would be to specify in the 
> Binding revocation draft that the alt-CoA must be saved in the BCE.
> 
> domagoj
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Haley [mailto:brian.haley at hp.com]
> > Sent: 20. listopad 2008 19:53
> > To: Premec, Domagoj
> > Cc: Alper Yegin; Netlmm; mext at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [netlmm] [MEXT] Alt-CoA and PMIP6 (was RE: 
> > FW:comment ondraft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-01)
> > 
> > Premec, Domagoj wrote:
> > > I agree with others here that the source IP of the BU is
> > available during the BU/Back transaction processing and once the 
> > transaction is completed,  the source IP of the BU is gone. 
> IMO if we 
> > want the source IP of the BU to be saved in the BCE, this must be 
> > specified in some RFC.
> > 
> > I agree that we don't need the source address once we send 
> the BAck, 
> > just the CoA, which is usually the source address.
> > But I don't think we need to specify if the address is saved in the 
> > conceptual data structure mentioned in 3775, 
> implementations are free 
> > to store additional information in a BCE if they wish, and 
> most do.  
> > If some new draft needs the original source address saved, then it 
> > should specify it.
> > Maybe that's what you meant and I mis-understood?
> > 
> > -Brian
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> 
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.