Re: [MEXT] Revoking all bindings of an MN
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MEXT] Revoking all bindings of an MN
Hi Suresh,
Probably what you meant is to modify the requirement under section 6.1.
What about the following:
o Home Network Prefix option [RFC5213]. This option is mandatory
when the (P) bit is set and the BRI is used for revoking a single
binding cache entry.
What do you think?
Regards,
Ahmad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:46 AM
> To: mext at ietf.org
> Subject: [MEXT] Revoking all bindings of an MN
>
> Hi Folks,
> Section 9.2.1 contains the following text about revoking
> all PMIP bindings for a given MN-ID when no HNP is present
>
> "
> 1. If only the mobile node identifier, MN-ID, option
> is included,
> the local mobility anchor MUST revoke all bindings for this
> mobile node which have a proxy CoA that is used as
> the source
> of the IPv6 packet that carried the BRI or in the Alternate
> Care-of-Address option in the BRI.
> "
>
> I consider this to be a valid use case. But the text in
> Section 6.1 about the P bit disallows this scenario
>
>
> "o Home Network Prefix option [RFC5213]. This option is mandatory
> when the (P) bit is set."
>
> I request the authors to remove this restriction in section 6.1.
>
> Cheers
> Suresh
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.