Re: [MEXT] FW: New Version Notification for draft-patil-mext-mip6issueswithipsec-00
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MEXT] FW: New Version Notification for draft-patil-mext-mip6issueswithipsec-00



Title: Re: [MEXT] FW: New Version Notification for draft-patil-mext-mip6issueswithipsec-00

Hi Behcet,

The main point of the I-D is that the choice of IPsec as the protocol for securing MIP6 signaling was premature and hence needs to be reconsidered.

-Raj


On 10/27/08 4:20 PM, "ext Behcet Sarikaya" <behcetsarikaya at yahoo.com> wrote:

Hi Raj,
  I read this draft with interest. I remember long and heated debate in 6man list on IPSec being mandatory in IPv6.
  Overall I kind of disagree with you saying that MIPv6 hasn't been widely deployed just because of IPSec. Probably the status of IPv6 deployment has something to do with it.

Regards,

Behcet


From: Basavaraj Patil <basavaraj.patil at nokia.com>
To: "mext at ietf.org" <mext at ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 12:27:33 PM
Subject: [MEXT] FW: New Version Notification for draft-patil-mext-mip6issueswithipsec-00


FYI,

------ Forwarded Message
From: ext IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission at ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: Basavaraj Patil <basavaraj.patil at nokia.com>
Cc: Charles Perkins <charliep at wichorus.com>, <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-patil-mext-mip6issueswithipsec-00


A new version of I-D, draft-patil-mext-mip6issueswithipsec-00.txt has been
successfuly submitted by Basavaraj Patil and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:  draft-patil-mext-mip6issueswithipsec
Revision:  00
Title:   Issues related to the design choice of IPsec for Mobile IPv6
security
Creation_date:  2008-10-27
WG ID:   Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 15

Abstract:
Mobile IPv6 as specified in RFC3775 relies on IPsec for security.  An
IPsec SA between the mobile node and the home agent provides security
for the mobility signaling.  Use of IPsec for securing the data
traffic between the mobile node and home agent is optional.  This
document analyses the implications of the design decision to mandate
IPsec as the default security protocol for Mobile IPv6 and recommends
revisiting this decision in view of the experience gained from
implementation and adoption in other standards bodies.
                   


The IETF Secretariat.



------ End of Forwarded Message

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

 
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.