[MEXT] A few findings on the binding revocation draft

[Teemu Rinta-aho <teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com>]

Hi all,

here are some newcomer's findings on the
binding revocation draft -01:

1) In Fig 2 and 3 there is a field "Cause" in BRA.
   Where is it defined in more detail?

2) In 9.1.1. it is stated that "The Global (G) bit MUST
   be set and..." without any conditions. However, in the
   next bullet, it is stated that "Whenever the Global (G)
   bit is set", implying that it does not always need to
   be set. These texts are controversial and should be fixed.

Some typos found:

3.4.3: "LMA may only supports IPv4" -> "LMA may only support IPv4"

8.2: "the home SHOULD examine" -> "the home agent SHOULD examine"

     "the home agent delete" -> "the home agent deletes"

9.1.1: "anchor send a" -> "anchor sends a"

       "LMA MUST sends a" -> "LMA MUST send a"


Best regards,
Teemu Rinta-aho

--
Teemu Rinta-aho                    Tel: +358 9 299 3078
NomadicLab, Ericsson Research      Fax: +358 9 299 3535
Oy L M Ericsson Ab                 Mobile: +358 40 562 3066
FIN-02420 Jorvas, Finland          E-mail: teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext