RE: CGA-based HoA generation for MIP6 (was RE: [Mipshop] Review of draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-04)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CGA-based HoA generation for MIP6 (was RE: [Mipshop] Review of draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-04)
hello,
auto-configured home addresses are addressed in section
5.3.2 of draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split-02.txt.
in the current specs, the home agent does not care whether
the home address was generated using CGA, stateless address
auto-configuration or RFC 3041.
Vijay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko at piuha.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 1:13 PM
> To: Narayanan, Vidya
> Cc: Christian Vogt; mipshop at ietf.org; Vijay Devarapalli
> Subject: Re: CGA-based HoA generation for MIP6 (was RE:
> [Mipshop] Review of draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-04)
>
> Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
>
> >One question regarding CGA-based HoAs - don't we need to specify how
> >CGA-based HoAs impact home registrations? For instance, the preferred
> >HoA bootstrapping mechanism today is using IKEv2. I'd imagine that we
> >will need to specify how a CGA-based HoA is generated after
> MPD and how
> >that binding is registered with the HA (i.e., does it need
> to be signed?
> >Does the HA also need to know if the HoA has been generated using
> >CGAs?).
> >
> >
> Good question! I do not recall if this has been analyzed
> during the design of cga-cba draft. But taking a look at
> draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec, it does allow the mobile node
> to suggest what address to use. I'm not sure the draft
> says anything about discovering the prefix first before
> suggesting an address (which would be needed for CGAs),
> but this seems in general possible in IKEv2. Vijay, are
> you listening?
>
> --Jari
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.