[Mipshop] Re: FW: Last Call: 'Goals for Network-based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-netlmm-nohost-req)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mipshop] Re: FW: Last Call: 'Goals for Network-based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-netlmm-nohost-req)
Reminder: Last day of the Last Call period.
Jari Arkko wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>NETLMM WG has produced a document that outlines the
>goals for a local mobility management solution. It also
>analyzes the fullfillment of those goals wrt existing global
>mobility management protocols (Mobile IPv6) and local
>mobility management solutions (e.g., HMIPv6).
>
>It would be valuable to get additional review from the
>MIPSHOP and MIP6 WGs regarding the latter part.
>The gap analysis in Section 8 of the document.
>
>The best place for follow-ups is probably the NETLMM list,
>though as always you can also send last call comments to
>the IETF main list or the IESG directly.
>
>
>
>>The IESG has received a request from the Network-based Localized Mobility
>>Management WG to consider the following document:
>>
>>- 'Goals for Network-based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM) '
>> <draft-ietf-netlmm-nohost-req-04.txt> as an Informational RFC
>>
>>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>>final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
>>iesg at ietf.org or ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2006-08-25.
>>
>>The file can be obtained via
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netlmm-nohost-req-04.txt
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.