RE: [Mipshop] MIPSHOP Draft Agenda for IETF 67

["Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin at yegin.org>]

> There was also consensus
> (as much consensus as there has been for any document in MIPSHOP) for
> adoption of this document. 

When was this consensus reached? I might have missed it, but I'd appreciate
a reference. (Also, I don't know what is meant by " as much consensus as
there has been for any document in MIPSHOP". Is there a different consensus
building practice in this WG?)

> the WG needs to be convinced that these alternatives
> are better and have advantages over the drafts that
> are being considered currently.

What's going on is, there are multiple solutions for the same problems. The
WG needs to evaluate and see if it makes sense to standardize one or more of
the solutions. All I'm trying to confirm is that nothing is cast in stone,
until all solutions are considered.

Alper






_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop