Re: [Mipshop] Re: New revision of draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rfc4068bis
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mipshop] Re: New revision of draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rfc4068bis





On Jan 30, 2008 3:44 PM, Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalli at azairenet.com> wrote:

I think this should be explained in more detail. How about the
following?

The NAR checks if the address is unique before starting
defending it. The NAR sends a DAD (neighbor solicitation) message
for the NCoA to check if the address is unique on the NAR link.
If there are other mechanisms by which the NAR can figure out if
the address is unique or if it is known that the probability of
collisions is very low or non-existent, then the parameter
DupAddrDetectTransmits is set to 0 on the NAR.

Sounds good.

-Rajeev

 

Vijay

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.