Re: [Mipshop] Review of Transient Binding Spec

["Koodli, Rajeev" <rkoodli at starentnetworks.com>]

Hi,
 
 
> > RKo> I see below that HNP is such a parameter. Without HNP, the MN
can
> >    still continue to use the previously assigned HNP, right? From
MN's
> >    point of view, if it thinks that it's on the same default router,
> >    it continues to use the assigned/advertised prefix unless NUD
> >    [rfc4861] fails. For this, the MN needs to receive the RA from
same 
> >     link-local address as before. 
> 
> The nMAG might need to talk to the LMA, through PBU and 
> PBACK, to figure out which link local address to use for the 
> router advertisement.
> 

Even when the link-local address for the MAG is pre-configured? Probably
not..

-Rajeev


> Vijay
>