Re: [Mipshop] transient binding draft update

["Koodli, Rajeev" <rkoodli at starentnetworks.com>]

Hi Marco,

Thanks for taking input into account. I have a clarification on the
following:

*  Added note about static implementation specific approach and
reference
   to Appendix B to the Introduction.

   "..Some implementation specific solutions, such as static
configuration
   and introducing some delays, may help to reduce some issues addressed
   in this draft, which is discussed in Appendix B.  A dynamic solution
   by means of the proposed protocol operation helps to optimize the
   performance for a variety of handover situations and different radio
   characteristics."

What do you mean by "..introducing some delays,.." in the first
sentence? 
I can think of buffering, and if you mean the same, could you reword it?
I also suggest a slight revision of the statement. Something like:

"..Some implementation specific solutions, such as static configuration
and buffering, can help to address some of the issues identified in this
draft,.."

Regards,

-Rajeev


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mipshop-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:mipshop-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:56 AM
> To: Mipshop
> Subject: [Mipshop] transient binding draft update
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> please find below a list of changes for the transient binding 
> draft update.
> Thanks for all comments. We'll post the update in a next step.
> 
> marco
> 
> 
>