Re: [Mipshop] transient binding draft update
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mipshop] transient binding draft update



Hi Rajeev,

Koodli, Rajeev wrote:
Hi,
   The problem that the transient binding cache mechanism is trying to
   address can also be achieved through implementation-specific mechanisms
   on the LMA, such a configuration on the LMA to accept uplink packets
   both from the pMAG and the nMAG during a handover and through buffering
   at the nMAG. However, dynamic solutions by means of the proposed
   extension in this document is needed to optimize the performance for
   a variety of handover situations and different radio characteristics.
   See Appendix B for a more detailed discussion on this.
I am surprised that you propose the same text as two weeks ago, which we
commented on and proposed alternative text. I think we clarified why the above text
is not appropriate.
Very difficult to proceed..

Isn't the text above saying the same thing? To me, it's clear.
Since both mean the same to you, we adopted the modification you
proposed in your last mail and consider this issue closed now.

Thanks,
marco



_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.