Re: [MMUSIC] RTSP: Connectionless vs. connection-based

[Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@era.ericsson.se>]

Hi Venkat,

I agree with your points. As a clarification and in reference to to my 
latest message to jonathan, there is need for time-out on both the RTSP 
session and the transport connection. If any of the time-out happens, 
the resources related to time-out can be released. What we haven't 
resolved so far is what the value of the transport time-out is and how 
it should work.

Regards

Magnus 

Venkat N wrote:

> Hi Magnus,
>  
> Few points which I have in mind:
> The server should have the right to close the
> connection in case of timeout and this right
> need not always be with the client .
> Assuming the client does not close the connection
> and is not actually sending any request , then
> in this case the server would be polling on this
> filedescriptor also among the set of connected filedescriptors
> which could be avoided .
> When the client sends a TearDown , we understand that
> the session is no longer valid and all resources have been
> released  .
> The above implies that the connection is still valid and
> a subsequent request by the client could take place in
> the same connection instead of going for a "SETUP" in
> a different connection .But here we also need to
> consider how long can we have the connection alive .
>
>-- 
> Regards,
>-Venkat
>
>Visit http://cdn.hcltech.com/
>
>  
>
>  
>   
>

Magnus Westerlund 

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research ERA/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson Radio Systems AB  | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@era.ericsson.se




_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic