[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MMUSIC] An error in SDP syntax regarding r= lines?
--> Federico Montesino Pouzols writes:
> I understand the draft mandates the leading zero from the
>following paragraph:
>
>o ``r='' fields specify repeat times for a session. For example, if
> a session is active at 10am on Monday and 11am on Tuesday for one
> hour each week for three months, then the <start time> in the
> corresponding ``t='' field would be the NTP representation of 10am
> on the first Monday, the <repeat interval> would be 1 week, the
> <active duration> would be 1 hour, and the offsets would be zero and
> 25 hours. The corresponding ``t='' field stop time would be the NTP
> representation of the end of the last session three months later. By
> default all fields are in seconds, so the ``r='' and ``t='' fields
> might be:
>
> So I guess the first offset could be non zero only if the start
>time given in the corresponding t= line were shifted from the actual
>beginning of the session. I believe the first offset is always 0 and it
>could be omitted if backward compatibility were not a concern. Is it
>true?
The ABNF in RFC 2327 does not require the leading zero.
Colin
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic