[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MMUSIC] Optional SRTP?

To: Alan Johnston <alan at sipstation.com>, Rick Porter <rporter at covergence.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Optional SRTP?
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:55:51 -0800
Cc: "mmusic at ietf.org" <mmusic at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <442C140B.2090602@sipstation.com>
List-help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcZVtYN7whRHn8GoEdq8VQARJEEJ/A==
Thread-topic: [MMUSIC] Optional SRTP?
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209

Hi Rick - this is an important problem and it needs to be solved. There are
a lot of proposal but certainly no solutions yet.

On 3/30/06 9:23 AM, "Alan Johnston" <alan at sipstation.com> wrote:

> Another bad alternative is to offer a secure SDP offer first, and then
> if it fails, send a second insecure SDP offer.

As has been pointed out before, one of the downsides of this is, if your
voicemail system supports SRTP, and your phone does not. This guarantees
that callers that do SRTP will only be able to get voicemail.

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

References:
- Re: [MMUSIC] Optional SRTP?
  - From: Alan Johnston

Prev by Date: Re: [MMUSIC] Minutes IETF-65 ?
Next by Date: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-fec-grouping-03.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [MMUSIC] Optional SRTP?
Next by thread: RE: [MMUSIC] Optional SRTP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread