Section 7.1.1.1., 1st paragraph on page 40:
"(...) This priority value will be computed identically to how
the priority for the local candidate of the pair was computed, except
that the type preference is set to the value for peer derived
candidate types."
Just a little conformance issue: "(...) for peer derived candidate
types" would be "(...) for peer reflexive candidate types".
Regards,
Guilherme Balena Versiani.
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic