Section 7.1.1.1. "PRIORITY and USE-CANDIDATE", first paragraph:
(...) This priority value will be computed identically to how
the priority for the local candidate of the pair was computed, except
that the type preference is set to the value for peer derived
candidate types.
The term "peer derived" should be "peer reflexive", isn't it?
Regards,
Guilherme Balena Versiani.
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic