Re: [MMUSIC] Updated ICE-tcp

["Elwell, John" <john.elwell at siemens.com>]

Fine, but perhaps worth mentioning.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:jdrosen at cisco.com] 
> Sent: 28 February 2008 16:14
> To: Elwell, John
> Cc: IETF MMUSIC WG
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Updated ICE-tcp
> 
> Good question.
> 
> If you want to do v6 transition for a tcp session, you'd need 
> full ICE.
> 
> -Jonathan R.
> 
> Elwell, John wrote:
> > Jonathan,
> > 
> >> * added usage of comedia instead of defining an ice-lite for 
> >> tcp; allow 
> >> for an offer or answer to have ICE for UDP and just comedia 
> >> for TCP, in 
> >> which case ICE proceeds. Defined some rules around selection of 
> >> direction attributes needed for interop. This turned out to be 
> >> relatively easy to incorporate compared to the other approaches we 
> >> discussed last meeting.
> > [JRE] So where does this leave us with IPv6 transition and 
> the need to
> > provide IPv4 and IPv6 candidates?
> > 
> > John
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   499 Thornall St.
> Cisco Fellow                                   Edison, NJ 08837
> Cisco, Voice Technology Group
> jdrosen at cisco.com
> http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (408) 902-3084
> http://www.cisco.com
> 
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic