Re: [MMUSIC] Closing on the SDPCapNeg modified m-line issue

I think the draft should go ahead with the existing single offer/answer
exchange possibility.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Mule
> Sent: 17 June 2008 17:03
> To: Flemming Andreasen; Ingemar Johansson S; Christer Holmberg
> Cc: mmusic@ietf.org; Joerg Ott
> Subject: [MMUSIC] Closing on the SDPCapNeg modified m-line issue
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-ne
> gotiation-
> 08
> 
> I have been watching the thread on the SDP capneg draft and 
> the comments
> raised by Ingemar and Christer on the potential problems that may be
> caused by SIP entities along the signaling path due to the modified m
> line in the SDP answer. As Flemming recapped, the SDP capability
> negotiation draft along with the media capability draft's latent
> configurations provide a solution for those SDP agents that want to be
> cautious.
> 
> Given the above and the fact that this issue had been raised 
> in the past
> and that at the time, there was consensus to allow capability
> negotiation in 1 offer/answer exchange with the above potential issues
> taken into consideration, we chairs intend to go ahead and request
> publication as soon as draft-09 is out.
> 
> If there are any additional concerns on this draft, or if the above
> closure on the modified m-line issue is not good enough or does not
> reflect what you think is the wg consensus, please send 
> comments to the
> list by Friday June 20.
> 
> Jean-Francois.
> MMUSIC co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> 
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic