Re: [MMUSIC] Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5)

["Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson at ericsson.com>]

Hi

In 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07613.html
Kyunghun Jung gave a response regarding 3GPP SA4s view on the draft.

In 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07614.html
I beleieve I have clarified the issues that was raised during the AVT
session and the discussion with Roni Even and Jonathan Lennox
afterwards.

With this in mind I would like to know what is missing in order to make
this draft advance to WGLC.

Regards
Ingemar 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonzalo Camarillo 
> Sent: den 5 maj 2009 13:37
> To: Jean-Francois Mule
> Cc: Ingemar Johansson S; jo at acm.org; mmusic at ietf.org; Magnus 
> Westerlund
> Subject: Re: Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was 
> RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> yes, Jean Francois suggested way forward sounds perfect. 
> Let's make sure that whatever we advance in MMUSIC meets 
> 3GPP's expectations. They can review the drafts without the 
> need of sending LSs back and forth.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> Jean-Francois Mule wrote:
> > Ingemar,
> > 
> >   Thank you for the ping and the updated draft.
> > 
> >   Before issuing the WGLC, I would like to understand a few things, 
> > mostly because there has been limited to no traffic on this 
> draft on 
> > the MMUSIC list.
> > 
> > 1) Follow-ups from IETF#74 in San Francisco You had asked a 
> bunch of 
> > questions in your presentation during the last mmusic meeting.
> > On some, you got feedback from Roni Even, Jonathan Lennox 
> and others.
> > Can you summarize the related changes if any and they address those 
> > comments? (Roni re: distortion, Jonathan Lennox re: sender 
> behavior to 
> > accommodate different behaviors for cases like when the source 
> > supports non squared pixels).
> > Also, on a few other questions, there were no comments at 
> the mike and 
> > nothing on the list since the meeting.  Can you jot them 
> down outside 
> > ppt and generate or close some discussion points related to these?
> > 
> > 
> > 2) 3GPP
> > Finally MMUSIC had received a LS from 3GPP related to this 
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file541.doc).  The 
> > liaison had Magnus Westerlund and Kyunghun Jung as 
> technical contacts 
> > for 3GPP (K Jung is a co-author of the ID).  Has this work been 
> > reviewed there by folks who might use it?  Can some of these 
> > individuals send text to the IETF MMUSIC list to say they 
> review the 
> > document and think it is ready for WGLC.
> > On behalf of MMUSIC, we can send a formal liaison back to 3GPP via 
> > Gonzalo anyway but if we get a sense that this draft meets the 3gpp 
> > requirements and folks are ok with the solution directly on 
> the MMUSIC 
> > list, we speed things up and avoid paperwork.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jean-Francois.
> > MMUSIC co-chair
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ingemar Johansson S [mailto:ingemar.s.johansson at ericsson.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 4:32 AM
> >> To: jo at acm.org; Jean-Francois Mule
> >> Cc: mmusic at ietf.org
> >> Subject: RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I would like to have draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes 
> advanced to 
> >> WGLC.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Ingemar
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -----
> >>> Message: 1
> >>> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:56:37 +0200
> >>> From: "Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson at ericsson.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D
> >>> 	Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes-02.txt
> >>> To: <mmusic at ietf.org>
> >>> Message-ID:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8CE1D957 at esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.s
> >> e>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> As you can see below, a new version of 
> >>> draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes has been submitted. 
> With this I 
> >>> would say that the open issues that was existing before 
> are resolved 
> >>> and that the document is ready for WGLC.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> /Ingemar
> >>>
> 
>