[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MMUSIC] Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5)
- To: "Jean-Francois Mule" <jf.mule at cablelabs.com>, <jo at acm.org>
- Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5)
- From: "Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson at ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:20:54 +0200
- Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson at ericsson.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com>, mmusic at ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo at ericsson.com>
- Delivered-to: mmusic at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C012A5320 at esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
- List-help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <mailman.64.1240254008.28215.mmusic at ietf.org> <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8CFE7804 at esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se> <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C601C76FC8 at srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> <4A0024D2.5020807 at ericsson.com> <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C012A5320 at esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
- Thread-index: AcnNdciVKfEfWBdvRYy8+8d3GCS07AQZIC2QAcbXyLA=
- Thread-topic: Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ingemar Johansson S
> Sent: den 26 maj 2009 10:31
> To: Jean-Francois Mule; jo at acm.org
> Cc: mmusic at ietf.org; Magnus Westerlund; Gonzalo Camarillo;
> kyunghun.jung at samsung.com; Ingemar Johansson S
> Subject: RE: Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was
> RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5)
>
> Hi
>
> In
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07613.html
> Kyunghun Jung gave a response regarding 3GPP SA4s view on the draft.
>
> In
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07614.html
> I beleieve I have clarified the issues that was raised during
> the AVT session and the discussion with Roni Even and
> Jonathan Lennox afterwards.
>
> With this in mind I would like to know what is missing in
> order to make this draft advance to WGLC.
>
> Regards
> Ingemar
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gonzalo Camarillo
> > Sent: den 5 maj 2009 13:37
> > To: Jean-Francois Mule
> > Cc: Ingemar Johansson S; jo at acm.org; mmusic at ietf.org; Magnus
> > Westerlund
> > Subject: Re: Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was
> > RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > yes, Jean Francois suggested way forward sounds perfect.
> > Let's make sure that whatever we advance in MMUSIC meets 3GPP's
> > expectations. They can review the drafts without the need
> of sending
> > LSs back and forth.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Gonzalo
> >
> > Jean-Francois Mule wrote:
> > > Ingemar,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the ping and the updated draft.
> > >
> > > Before issuing the WGLC, I would like to understand a
> few things,
> > > mostly because there has been limited to no traffic on this
> > draft on
> > > the MMUSIC list.
> > >
> > > 1) Follow-ups from IETF#74 in San Francisco You had asked a
> > bunch of
> > > questions in your presentation during the last mmusic meeting.
> > > On some, you got feedback from Roni Even, Jonathan Lennox
> > and others.
> > > Can you summarize the related changes if any and they
> address those
> > > comments? (Roni re: distortion, Jonathan Lennox re: sender
> > behavior to
> > > accommodate different behaviors for cases like when the source
> > > supports non squared pixels).
> > > Also, on a few other questions, there were no comments at
> > the mike and
> > > nothing on the list since the meeting. Can you jot them
> > down outside
> > > ppt and generate or close some discussion points related to these?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2) 3GPP
> > > Finally MMUSIC had received a LS from 3GPP related to this
> > >
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file541.doc). The
> > > liaison had Magnus Westerlund and Kyunghun Jung as
> > technical contacts
> > > for 3GPP (K Jung is a co-author of the ID). Has this work been
> > > reviewed there by folks who might use it? Can some of these
> > > individuals send text to the IETF MMUSIC list to say they
> > review the
> > > document and think it is ready for WGLC.
> > > On behalf of MMUSIC, we can send a formal liaison back to
> 3GPP via
> > > Gonzalo anyway but if we get a sense that this draft
> meets the 3gpp
> > > requirements and folks are ok with the solution directly on
> > the MMUSIC
> > > list, we speed things up and avoid paperwork.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jean-Francois.
> > > MMUSIC co-chair
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ingemar Johansson S
> [mailto:ingemar.s.johansson at ericsson.com]
> > >> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 4:32 AM
> > >> To: jo at acm.org; Jean-Francois Mule
> > >> Cc: mmusic at ietf.org
> > >> Subject: RE: mmusic Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5
> > >>
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> I would like to have draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes
> > advanced to
> > >> WGLC.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Ingemar
> > >>>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -----
> > >>> Message: 1
> > >>> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:56:37 +0200
> > >>> From: "Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson at ericsson.com>
> > >>> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D
> > >>> Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes-02.txt
> > >>> To: <mmusic at ietf.org>
> > >>> Message-ID:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8CE1D957 at esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.s
> > >> e>
> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi
> > >>>
> > >>> As you can see below, a new version of
> > >>> draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes has been submitted.
> > With this I
> > >>> would say that the open issues that was existing before
> > are resolved
> > >>> and that the document is ready for WGLC.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> /Ingemar
> > >>>
> >
> >
>