[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MMUSIC] SDP extensions for Explicit Asymmetric RTP

To: mmusic at ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] SDP extensions for Explicit Asymmetric RTP
From: OKUMURA Shinji <shin at softfront.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:41:08 +0900
Delivered-to: mmusic at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi all,

I apologize if this has already been discussed.

I am thinking a little about "SDP extensions for Explicit Asymmetric RTP".
It is very simple extensions as below.

   m=audio 62986 RTP/AVP 0 4 18
   a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
   a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
   a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
   a=fmtp:4 sendonly
   a=fmtp:18 recvonly
   a=fmtp:4 ptime:30
   a=fmtp:18 ptime:20

Any thoughts on this extensions?

Regards,
Shinji

Prev by Date: [MMUSIC] RFC2326bis-22, Section 16.19 need clarification.
Next by Date: [MMUSIC] Re : SDP extensions for Explicit Asymmetric RTP
Previous by thread: [MMUSIC] RFC2326bis-22, Section 16.19 need clarification.
Next by thread: [MMUSIC] Re : SDP extensions for Explicit Asymmetric RTP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread