Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-tcp-08.txt

[Simon Perreault <simon.perreault at viagenie.ca>]

On Tuesday 13 October 2009 20:45:01 Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:
> 	Title           : TCP Candidates with Interactive Connectivity
> Establishment (ICE) Author(s)       : S. Perreault, J. Rosenberg
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-tcp-08.txt
> 	Pages           : 19
> 	Date            : 2009-10-13

This new revision is an effort to gauge what is the interest in ICE-TCP and 
where it should go. There is only one change, the addition of this paragraph:

      Note: It has been reported that the simultaneous-open technique
      has a low success rate (~40%) with the population of NAT devices
      in use as of this writing.  Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that
      implementations of this specification acquire and use IPv6 host
      candidates.  Means of doing so across NATs include Tunnel Setup
      Protocol [I-D.blanchet-v6ops-tunnelbroker-tsp], Teredo [RFC4380],
      IPSec NAT-T [RFC3947], and others.


Two questions for this WG:

- Should this effort be dropped or continue?

- What is needed for this draft to get WG consensus?

Thanks, and sorry for not posting this sooner,
Simon
-- 
DNS64 open-source   --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server    --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0           --> http://www.vcarddav.org