Re: [MMUSIC] RTSP 2.0: IANA rules for status codes

["Martin Stiemerling" <Stiemerling at nw.neclab.eu>]

Hi Magnus, all,

Expert review is IMHO a sufficient level for status codes. 

  Martin

stiemerling at nw.neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund
> Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 1:47 PM
> To: mmusic (E-mail)
> Subject: [MMUSIC] RTSP 2.0: IANA rules for status codes
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to raise a discussion about the IANA rules for status
> codes. It is currently defined as Standards action. That is pretty high
> bar and block other SDOs from doing extensions using status codes. I
> think there might be a point in doing Specification required with
> Expert
> Review.
> 
> What is the WG's view on this?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic