[Mobopts] ID-update of draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mobopts] ID-update of draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps
Dear all,
we just updated the problem statement ID:
"Multicast Mobility in MIPv6: Problem Statement and Brief Survey"
Abstract
This document discusses current mobility extensions to IP layer
multicast. It describes problems arising from mobile group
communication in general, the case of multicast listener mobility,
and for mobile senders using Any Source Multicast and Source Specific
Multicast. Characteristic aspects of multicast routing and deployment
issues for fixed IPv6 networks are summarized. Specific properties
and interplays with the underlying network access are surveyed with
respect to the relevant technologies in the wireless domain. It
outlines the principal approaches to multicast mobility, together
with a comprehensive exploration of the mobile multicast problem and
solution space. This document concludes with a conceptual roadmap for
initial steps in standardization for use by future mobile multicast
protocol designers.
It should be on the ID directory soon:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-04
but may be immediately downloaded from:
http://www.realmv6.org/papers/draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-04.txt
This version is a major update, including
* a new co-author: Gorry Fairhurst
* an extended discussion of transport issues
* an updated L2 section: 4.2.2 802.16 WIMAX
* many editorial improvements
From the perspective of the authors this document is now ready for RGLC.
Please continue to push as towards a fine final document :-)
Best regards,
thomas
--
° Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° HAW Hamburg, Dept. Informatik
° University of Applied Sciences
° Berliner Tor 7, D 20099 Hamburg
° Germany, Fon: +49-40-42875-8157
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt
_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.