Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll for I-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll for I-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
Hello,
The deadline for the IRSG poll for I-D: draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions expired on Feb 26th.
So far we have received one no objection vote. Would like to hear from a few other people.
I am extending the deadline to March 15th. Please respond to the poll.
Again the choices are:
o 'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and reasonably
detailed review
o 'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read,
reasonably detailed review, and actionable comments.
o 'No objection' -- I don't object if this document
goes forward;
I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have some small
comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great
expertise in the area.
o 'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a
thorough review in a specified period of time.
Rgds,
-Basavaraj
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mobopts-bounces at irtf.org
> > [mailto:mobopts-bounces at irtf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:25 PM
> > To: irsg at isi.edu
> > Cc: Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com; mobopts at irtf.org
> > Subject: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll for
> > I-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Mobopts RG I-D:
> > draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions has completed IRSG
> > review.
> > The revised version of the I-D (Rev 12) which incorporates the
> > comments is now available at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-mobopts-locatio
> > n-privacy-solu
> > tions-12.txt.
> >
> > Michael Welzl who has performed the IRSG review and the Mobopts RG
> > have approved the revised I-D to be progressed for publication.
> >
> > The IRSG review is available from the IRTF tracker web page at:
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/24
> >
> > Please consider this email as the start of a two week IRSG
> poll. The
> > deadline for this poll is : Feb 26th, 2009.
> >
> > Please use one of the poll responses defined below.
> > The possible poll responses are:
> >
> > o 'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and reasonably
> > detailed review
> >
> > o 'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read,
> reasonably
> > detailed review, and actionable comments.
> >
> > o 'No objection' -- I don't object if this document
> goes forward;
> > I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have some small
> > comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great
> > expertise in the area.
> >
> > o 'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a
> > thorough review in a specified period of time.
> >
> > The most relevant rule is that "At least two other IRSG members
> > (besides the one sponsoring the document) need to vote 'ready to
> > publish' for the document to move forward."
> >
> > Please review and submit your vote.
> >
> > -Basavaraj
> > Document Shepherd for the I-D
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mobopts mailing list
> > Mobopts at irtf.org
> > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
> >
This email and any attachments may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information of Starent Networks, Corp. and is intended only for the individual or entity named in the message. The information transmitted may not be used to create or change any contractual obligations of Starent Networks, Corp. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail and its attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately -- by replying to this message or by sending an email to postmaster at starentnetworks.com -- and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments without reading or disclosing their contents. Thank you.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.