Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions



Hi, Wesley

Thanks for your review and support. My response inline

You can record a vote for "ready to publish" from me.

The document is well laid out and the relationships between it
and the many pieces of existing work are well described within
the document.

One substance nit is that the requirements listed in section
3 lack any associated "rationale" statements.  Including some
rationale alongside each requirement is general practice in
formal requirements management.

Do you mean we should brief the home/correspondent binding update and the RR procedure? OK, we will add it.

Another nit is that the document generally phrases the
problem as being to hide the mapping between "the home
address and the care-of address".  I believe it should
really be between "the home address and an in-use
care-of address", in order to ease later understanding
of the applicability to monami6, dsmip, or other
extensions that the conclusions say may be in-scope in
the future for clarification.

OK. Thanks for your observation.

Regards and Thanks
Qiu Ying



The problem of location privacy is very complex, and the
document does a good job of tracking each concern and
clearly explaining what appears in each relevant header
and option field in the stack so that the impact can be
readily assessed.  I appreciated this.

There are some editorial nits, but I believe they're minor
enough that the RFC Editor will fix them.

---------------------------
Wes Eddy
Network & Systems Architect
Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
Office: (216) 433-6682
---------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: mobopts-bounces at irtf.org
[mailto:mobopts-bounces at irtf.org] On Behalf Of
Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:41 PM
To: irsg at ISI.EDU
Cc: basavarj.patil at nokia.com; mobopts at irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll
forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions


Hello,

The deadline for the IRSG poll for I-D:
draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions expired on Feb 26th.

So far we have received one no objection vote. Would like to
hear from a few other people.
I am extending the deadline to March 15th. Please respond to the poll.

Again the choices are:

   o  'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and reasonably
       detailed review

   o  'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read,
      reasonably detailed review, and actionable comments.

   o  'No objection' -- I don't object if this document
     goes forward;
      I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have some small
      comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great
      expertise in the area.

   o  'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a
      thorough review in a specified period of time.

Rgds,
-Basavaraj

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mobopts-bounces at irtf.org
> [mailto:mobopts-bounces at irtf.org] On Behalf Of
> Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:25 PM
> To: irsg at isi.edu
> Cc: Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com; mobopts at irtf.org
> Subject: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll for
> I-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The Mobopts RG I-D:
> draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions has completed IRSG
> review.
> The revised version of the I-D (Rev 12) which incorporates the
> comments is now available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-mobopts-locatio
> n-privacy-solu
> tions-12.txt.
>
> Michael Welzl who has performed the IRSG review and the Mobopts RG
> have approved the revised I-D to be progressed for publication.
>
> The IRSG review is available from the IRTF tracker web page at:
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/24
>
> Please consider this email as the start of a two week IRSG
poll. The
> deadline for this poll is : Feb 26th, 2009.
>
> Please use one of the poll responses defined below.
> The possible poll responses are:
>
>     o  'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and
reasonably
>         detailed review
>
>     o  'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read,
reasonably
>        detailed review, and actionable comments.
>
>     o  'No objection' -- I don't object if this document
goes forward;
>        I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have some small
>        comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great
>        expertise in the area.
>
>     o  'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a
>        thorough review in a specified period of time.
>
> The most relevant rule is that "At least two other IRSG members
> (besides the one sponsoring the document) need to vote 'ready to
> publish' for the document to move forward."
>
> Please review and submit your vote.
>
> -Basavaraj
> Document Shepherd for the I-D
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobopts mailing list
> Mobopts at irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
>


This email and any attachments may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information of Starent Networks, Corp. and
is intended only for the individual or entity named in the
message.  The information transmitted may not be used to
create or change any contractual obligations of Starent
Networks, Corp.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
e-mail and its attachments by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately -- by
replying to this message or by sending an email to
postmaster at starentnetworks.com -- and destroy all copies of
this message and any attachments without reading or disclosing
their contents. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts at irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts

_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts at irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts

Institute for Infocomm Research disclaimer:  "This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you."

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.