Re: [Mobopts] Same MPA server for 2 access networks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mobopts] Same MPA server for 2 access networks



My question is more about a interworking scenario, more specifically inter-technology / intra-domain handover. Like a 3G-Wifi interworking scenario... we need have these agents in each access network but we can have a centralized MPA server, right?

Carlos Rodrigues

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashutosh Dutta" <adutta at research.telcordia.com>
To: "Carlos Rodrigues" <cmjr at iol.pt>
Cc: <mobopts at irtf.org>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] Same MPA server for 2 access networks


Carlos,
As I just replied to your personal email to me, you can have an AA (Authentication Agent) and CA (Configuration Agent) that are two logical components of an MPA server in the core of the IMS network. These two functions of course can coexist on the same physical box if that is what you are asking for.

Thanks
Ashutosh

Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
These agents need to stay with access network but I can have a centralized MPA server in the edge of IMS core, no?

It is like DNS... we don't have several DNS servers to access to the Internet. It is done relay...

Cheers,
Carlos Rodrigues (Computer Science BSc student)
ESTG - IPL
Leiria, Portugal

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashutosh Dutta" <adutta at research.telcordia.com>
To: "Carlos Rodrigues" <cmjr at iol.pt>
Cc: <mobopts at irtf.org>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] Same MPA server for 2 access networks


Carlos,
        Let me repeat some of what I have said earlier to you.
MPA server has several logical components, such as Authentication Agent, Configuration Agent, Buffering Agent, Tunneling agent. Some of these components could be aggregated for each access network, such as Authentication Agent, and Configuration Agent. However, part of Configuration Agent needs to stay with each access network (e.g., DHCP relay). Buffering Agent and Tunneling Agent usually stay at the edges with each access network.

Thus, it is a design decision as to how you want to split the functionality of the MPA server.

Thanks
Ashutosh


Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
Hi!

I have question about the number of MPA servers necessary in a interworking scenario. If I have a scenario with 2 access networks (with different technologies), will need two CA, two AA and two tunneling agents and buffering agents if perform handover from both ways (A to B and B to A), right?

First, I'm trying understand why (can give some tips?);
Second, it's not possible aggregate these 2 MPA server in a single entity? In a intra domain scenario makes sense.

All help or support will be very helpful.

Cheers,
Carlos Rodrigues (Computer Science BSc student)
ESTG - IPL
Leiria, Portugal

________________________________________________________________________________ Descubra as Soluções de Financiamento Cetelem.
Saiba mais em: http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0901272
_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts at irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts


________________________________________________________________________________ ANTECIPE A DEVOLUÇÃO DO SEU IRS e receba já o seu dinheiro...
I.R.Yes! da Capital Mais
http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0803281
_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts at irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts


________________________________________________________________________________
Financiamentos até €50.000. Simule já!
Saiba mais em: http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0901273

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.