Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] Request to progress I-D draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions to RFC editor

[Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli at gmail.com>]

Hi Aaron,

author's perspective: We did respond to all the comments and there was
subsequent response which indicated that the ID is ready for
publication.

A couple of typos were caught which can be fixed in RFC editor's review.

Thanks,

-Rajeev


On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Aaron Falk <falk at isi.edu> wrote:
> Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The IRSG poll for I-D: draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions has
>> been completed. Other than a few nits which can be addressed as part of the
>> RFC-editor process, there were no objections to publishing the document.
>>
>> The conclusion is that the I-D is ready for publication.
>>
>> In my role as the shepherd for this I-D, I recommend progressing this I-D to
>> the RFC editor for publication.
>>
>> -Basavaraj
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Hi Basavaraj-
>
> It doesn't look like the draft has been revised to respond to the
> comments from the IRSG review.  Wes Eddy and Stephen Farrell sent
> substantive but non-blocking comments.  Please respond to those that
> before requesting publication.  (The RFC Editor's 'Authors 48 Hours
> review' isn't intended to do another editing pass but to fix editorial
> issues that come up during RFC preparation.)
>
> When that's done, I'd like to ask that you prepare a 'request to
> publish' message that has a little more about the review history of the
> document.  I'm attaching a message from another doc so you can see
> what's expected.
>
> Let me know if you have questions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --aaron
>
>> Aaron: This is a request to publish the ICCRG's document
>> draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs-06 as an Informational RFC.
>>
>> The draft has been revised based on a number of reviews,
>> and the latest version incorporates editorial marks that
>> were submitted by Stephen Farrell and Juergen Shoenwaelder
>> during IRSG Review / Poll, where 2 "Ready to Publish" votes
>> were received, and none otherwise.  Prior to this, the
>> document has been reviewed and modified based on other IRSG
>> member reviews (Sally Floyd and Mark Allman) during the
>> ICCRG process.
>>
>> During the ICCRG's development of the document, specific
>> public reviews that changes were incorporated from were
>> submitted on the ICCRG list by:
>>
>> - Rex Buddenberg
>> - Mitchell Erblichs
>> - Lachlan Andrew
>> - Sally Floyd
>> - Gorry Fairhurst
>> - Lars Eggert
>> - Mark Allman
>>
>> The issue tracker entry includes the versions of the
>> draft since IRSG review started, and the reviews from
>> Juergen and Stephen:
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/25
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobopts mailing list
> Mobopts at irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
>