[MEXT] A comment on draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-00

[Sandesh <sksodhi at gmail.com>]

Hi All,

IMO following case is possible with PMIPv6 protocol
defined in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-00
and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-18

lt = lifetime
eth0 is the interface og MAG to the LAN in
which MN1 is present. MAG has another
interface eth1 through which it is connected to LMA.

MN1 ---- eth0 MAG eth1 -------LMA


            MAG                LMA
             |                  |
             |                  |
             |                  |
 eth0 down   |                  |
             |\ BRI(G)          |
 eth0 up     | \                |
(MN1 attaches)|  \     PBU(lt!=0)|
             |----------------->|
            From mext-bounces at ietf.org  Mon Aug  4 01:01:21 2008
Return-Path: <mext-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: monami6-archive at megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-monami6-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF6C3A68C6;
	Mon,  4 Aug 2008 01:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mext at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC4B3A68C6
	for <mext at core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  4 Aug 2008 01:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.727
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.271, 
	BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id feS7JE9XLico for <mext at core3.amsl.com>;
	Mon,  4 Aug 2008 01:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.234])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E13F3A6896
	for <mext at ietf.org>; Mon,  4 Aug 2008 01:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1644363rvf.49
	for <mext at ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
	:subject:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=hB2VTeUxAMeGUwmWIFbDyM5+6flPA01zk005UBDt8AA=;
	b=nTRD9dZOn35djX4FTGEBx1euMaPRxs/uWZwYHiAouE4eXiI9fJlTWRRQxwNgSKbh3S
	/ddl1d+a9tVYWxl3ZLJ4Fdr1loIe0c1jKEBcubJ+2/tgWjO1h0HfeO5tAtuuxiH6DwHe
	bM9fKAYorBeZefsZ5j+shoS31IFch6ym3jM2w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
	b=iyCbzRERuIMqi2TK753xmSO5BJXLpP+r35kQPAH4aGcF2zMeLyLf1WdpB5m2QRS3CI
	F6pbFNpp71GPA83Gwe1DS3ExStgnlk+78Tx91Rp6swa1Pr3yB8H/G8cMud+Pt165fkdY
	dJaVovMs4b9zgMrV/VR/o8hmwBdYRaB8RLwYE=
Received: by 10.141.129.14 with SMTP id g14mr7399878rvn.50.1217836877248;
	Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.141.10 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e75f55e20808040101y10555164i187b73049d6ce74b at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:31:17 +0530
From: Sandesh <sksodhi at gmail.com>
To: mext at ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [MEXT] A comment on draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-00
X-BeenThere: mext at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
	<mailto:mext-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
	<mailto:mext-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0880665298=="
Sender: mext-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces at ietf.org

Hi All,

IMO following case is possible with PMIPv6 protocol
defined in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-00
and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-18

lt = lifetime
eth0 is the interface og MAG to the LAN in
which MN1 is present. MAG has another
interface eth1 through which it is connected to LMA.

MN1 ---- eth0 MAG eth1 -------LMA


            MAG                LMA
             |                  |
             |                  |
             |                  |
 eth0 down   |                  |
             |\ BRI(G)          |
 eth0 up     | \                |
(MN1 attaches)|  \     PBU(lt!=0)|
       ;        |----------------->|
             |   \      +-------|
             |    \    /        |
             |     +----------->|
             |       /  +-------|
             | BRA  /  /        |
             |<----/--+         |
             |    /             |
             |   /              |
             |<-+               |
             | PBA              |
(BUL entry for MN1)           (no BCE MN1)

Reason -
1. As per these drafts BRI and PBU has their own
  (independent) sequence numbers.
2. BRI/BRA does not have timestamp option.
3. These drafts do not say that PBU cannot be sent
  if MAG has already sent BRI(G) to LMA.
4. In IP network missequencing of packets is possible.

Thanks and Regards,
Sandesh

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext