[mpls] Liaison - Progress on G.8110.1 Amendment
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[mpls] Liaison - Progress on G.8110.1 Amendment
To PWE3 WG:
I have been looking at the ITU SG15 Q12 Liaison Progress on G.8110.1
Amendment
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/liaison_detail.cgi?detail_id=312
Here are my first thoughts on a response - which will of course be
dressed up before they are formally sent out :)
Does anyone have any comments on these thoughts, or any other comments
that we should make as a WG?
- Stewart
Section 3.5 Transport MPLS definition
Should be amended to make it clear TMPLS is a true subset of IETF PWE3
over MPLS and that in the case of any differences, the IETF definition
is considered the Normative definition.
Section 4.7.2 and A.3
The PWE3 WG is concerned that the OAM is not based on VCCV. Any true
subset of the IETF PWE3/MPLS design should allow the use of the IETF
preferred OAM mechanism. This does not preclude the ITU specifying an
additional mechanism as an optional extension to enhance VCCV, although
it would be preferable for the ITU to work with the IETF to enhance VCCV
to provide the additional OAM mechanisms that are needed.
The PWE3 WG is not clear how you determine that the client signal is not
present when the client is a packet service.
Do we wish to comment on Sections 8.2.3 - intrusive monitoring and 8.2.4
Sublayer (Tandem) monitoring?
Section 4.10
– Minimize the rerouting distance (to avoid physical layer impairments
on the signals).
We do not understand why in a well engineered network the distance in
the virtual layer providing reroute has impact results in physical layer
impairments
Appendix V
The introductory material to Appendix V states that it will be
re-written at some time in the future to align with the IETF work on
p2mp LSPs. We have therefore not reviewed this section and request that
you resubmit this text for our review when it is aligned with the IETF
approach.
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.