Re: [mpls] poll on draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04.txt as wg document
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mpls] poll on draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04.txt as wg document



Loa,

I am in favor of this draft becoming a wg document. Here are some editorial comments that should probably be fixed in the next revision:

- Add an index.
- In the convergence discussion section it might be simple to also say that this will converge with the same characteristics as LDP ordered mode.
- It might be nice to explain the impact of a non compliant LSR as a P node in the middle of an MPLS network. The result is simply that the end to end LSP will not be established with no further adverse effect.



Thanks. Luca

Loa Andersson wrote:
Working Group,

the authors of draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04.txt has
requested that the draft is made a working group document.

Send your comments (pros or cons) to the working group
mailing list, or directly to the working group co-chairs.

Loa and George



_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.