Re: [mpls] poll on draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04.txt as wg document

[Luca Martini <lmartini at cisco.com>]

Loa,

I am in favor of this draft becoming a wg document. Here are some 
editorial comments that should probably be fixed in the next revision:

- Add an index.
- In the convergence discussion section it might be simple to also say 
that this will converge with the same characteristics as LDP ordered mode.
- It might be nice to explain the impact of a non compliant LSR as a P 
node in the middle of an MPLS network. The result is simply that the end 
to end LSP will not be established with no further adverse effect.


Thanks.
Luca

Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> the authors of draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04.txt has
> requested that the draft is made a working group document.
>
> Send your comments (pros or cons) to the working group
> mailing list, or directly to the working group co-chairs.
>
> Loa and George
>
>   


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls