Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429

To: "Thomas Nadeau" <tnadeau at lucidvision.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429
From: "Francesco Fondelli" <francesco.fondelli at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:09:13 +0200
Cc: mpls at ietf.org, Masayuki Takase <masayuki.takase.vx at hitachi.com>
Delivered-to: ietfarch-mpls-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: mpls at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=AIND1b4n0sgdxxEIKUSVo9CBJsaRaIxKCvRCOMPB+nc=; b=b+kgl8CmzIi7/nnHWjRYFajTtW0BucJsCRJPrSPutRktL+4s8k6YznLRc2X/ZMbJ/UMd5cgFg/IRcriDf2KwXAXcfSVyyBd0ImPTHq2l7O7DgCRvpRDoPsrWOyReTTxPiDwKOBl1OY1Pb/CpjAEWtv9ZzTXw5TL/iSlKre9b3ks=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YQTsxLqfhLu7rQy2E6UPX5UiYJ86yl7DAmtk//GEIGuG1sGC0T8qn/to8n60RKnsbQGBrgFWEHZr889b/PF6AYcLqI8lNoGyur2cP0xTamRKfJzSCaEPRyWXl9+4iz5dOWKrL2KLV2mK6GL2hGEBC+bd/BN0m5sMvHwOhJO6Xsw=
In-reply-to: <87F66FE4-36B3-4E17-8F5D-E2A716F838D3 at lucidvision.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <012101c894ad$99198a20$2204d69e at P4090> <87F66FE4-36B3-4E17-8F5D-E2A716F838D3 at lucidvision.com>
Sender: mpls-bounces at ietf.org

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau at lucidvision.com> wrote:
>
>         How could you have built MPLS OAM to support label 14? Do you mean
>  you implemented Y1711 using label 14?
>
>         --Tom

Back in 2002/2003/2004? there used to be no 'T-' :-)

http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.1711/en

"Y.1711: Operation & Maintenance mechanism for MPLS networks"

Clear, isn't it? //I'm sarcastic

Ciao
FF
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429
  - From: Thomas Nadeau

References:
- [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429
  - From: Masayuki Takase
- Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429
  - From: Thomas Nadeau

Prev by Date: Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429
Next by Date: Re: [mpls] [Tsvwg] WG last call for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-user-error-spec-03
Previous by thread: Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429
Next by thread: Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.