Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429

["Shahram Davari" <davari at ieee.org>]

Tom,

Could you please provide your definition of MPLS OAM? I have been involved
in MPLS and OAM for more than 10 years and my understanding is that Y.1711
is the first MPLS OAM defined in the industry.

-Shahram

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Thomas Nadeau
Sent: April-02-08 7:33 PM
To: Francesco Fondelli
Cc: mpls at ietf.org; Masayuki Takase
Subject: Re: [mpls] Question on the status of Y.1711 and RFC3429


	ITU recommendation Y1711 has nothing to do with MPLS OAM.  If you  
want a
good overview of IETF MPLS OAM take a look at RFC4221.

	--Tom



On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Francesco Fondelli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Thomas Nadeau  
> <tnadeau at lucidvision.com> wrote:
>>
>>        How could you have built MPLS OAM to support label 14? Do  
>> you mean
>> you implemented Y1711 using label 14?
>>
>>        --Tom
>
> Back in 2002/2003/2004? there used to be no 'T-' :-)
>
> http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.1711/en
>
> "Y.1711: Operation & Maintenance mechanism for MPLS networks"
>
> Clear, isn't it? //I'm sarcastic
>
> Ciao
> FF
>

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls